<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Linux Blog &#187; Linux servers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linuxblog.org/category/linux-servers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linuxblog.org</link>
	<description>Linux server and open source blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 06:39:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Nic card bug e1000_acquire_swflag_ich8lan</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxblog.org/nic-card-bug-e1000_acquire_swflag_ich8lan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxblog.org/nic-card-bug-e1000_acquire_swflag_ich8lan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 14:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux servers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxblog.org/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting the following bug&#8230;. bad luck :(
Running Centos, 32 bit
BUG: warning at drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c:361/e1000_acquire_swflag_ich8lan() (Not tainted)
 [] e1000_acquire_swflag_ich8lan+0&#215;6e/0&#215;86 [e1000e]
 [] e1000e_read_kmrn_reg+0&#215;10/0&#215;4e [e1000e]
 [] e1000e_gig_downshift_workaround_ich8lan+0&#215;23/0&#215;66 [e1000e]
 [] e1000_intr_msi+0&#215;46/0xd4 [e1000e]
 [] handle_IRQ_event+0&#215;23/0&#215;49
 [] __do_IRQ+0&#215;84/0xd6
 [] do_IRQ+0&#215;93/0xae
 [] common_interrupt+0&#215;1a/0&#215;20
 [] e1000e_mc_addr_list_update_generic+0&#215;95/0&#215;148 [e1000e]
 [] e1000_mc_addr_list_update+0xe/0&#215;12 [e1000e]
 [] e1000_set_multi+0xcd/0xd5 [e1000e]
 [] __dev_mc_upload+0&#215;1d/0&#215;1e
 [] dev_mc_upload+0&#215;28/0&#215;3b
 [] dev_open+0&#215;44/0&#215;62
 [] dev_change_flags+0&#215;47/0xe4
 [] devinet_ioctl+0&#215;24e/0&#215;542
 [] [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting the following bug&#8230;. bad luck :(<br />
Running Centos, 32 bit</p>
<p>BUG: warning at drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c:361/e1000_acquire_swflag_ich8lan() (Not tainted)<br />
 [<f8963144>] e1000_acquire_swflag_ich8lan+0&#215;6e/0&#215;86 [e1000e]<br />
 [<f89675d9>] e1000e_read_kmrn_reg+0&#215;10/0&#215;4e [e1000e]<br />
 [<f896317f>] e1000e_gig_downshift_workaround_ich8lan+0&#215;23/0&#215;66 [e1000e]<br />
 [<f896cfa2>] e1000_intr_msi+0&#215;46/0xd4 [e1000e]<br />
 [<c044deb3>] handle_IRQ_event+0&#215;23/0&#215;49<br />
 [<c044df5d>] __do_IRQ+0&#215;84/0xd6<br />
 [<c04073f4>] do_IRQ+0&#215;93/0xae<br />
 [<c040592e>] common_interrupt+0&#215;1a/0&#215;20<br />
 [<f8965855>] e1000e_mc_addr_list_update_generic+0&#215;95/0&#215;148 [e1000e]<br />
 [<f896a0e0>] e1000_mc_addr_list_update+0xe/0&#215;12 [e1000e]<br />
 [<f896a4c3>] e1000_set_multi+0xcd/0xd5 [e1000e]<br />
 [<c05b1ca5>] __dev_mc_upload+0&#215;1d/0&#215;1e<br />
 [<c05b1db3>] dev_mc_upload+0&#215;28/0&#215;3b<br />
 [<c05b029e>] dev_open+0&#215;44/0&#215;62<br />
 [<c05aedaa>] dev_change_flags+0&#215;47/0xe4<br />
 [<c05e9d6f>] devinet_ioctl+0&#215;24e/0&#215;542<br />
 [<c05a6337>] sock_ioctl+0&#215;191/0&#215;1b3<br />
 [<c05a61a6>] sock_ioctl+0&#215;0/0&#215;1b3<br />
 [<c0480644>] do_ioctl+0&#215;1c/0&#215;5d<br />
 [<c04808cf>] vfs_ioctl+0&#215;24a/0&#215;25c<br />
 [<c0480929>] sys_ioctl+0&#215;48/0&#215;5f<br />
 [<c0404eff>] syscall_call+0&#215;7/0xb<br />
 =======================<br />
pci0000:00: eth0: Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX<br />
pci0000:00: eth0: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO</c0404eff></c0480929></c04808cf></c0480644></c05a61a6></c05a6337></c05e9d6f></c05aedaa></c05b029e></c05b1db3></c05b1ca5></f896a4c3></f896a0e0></f8965855></c040592e></c04073f4></c044df5d></c044deb3></f896cfa2></f896317f></f89675d9></f8963144></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxblog.org/nic-card-bug-e1000_acquire_swflag_ich8lan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apache KeepAliveTimeout tunning</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxblog.org/apache-keepalivetimeout-tunning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxblog.org/apache-keepalivetimeout-tunning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxblog.org/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many of our readers are asking what KeepAliveTimeout setting should be used for Apache config. We usually select 2 to 5 seconds as it provides best performance for sites with medium visitors and prefer to use Nginx or any other front-end proxy to better manage thousands of multiple concurrent users.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of our readers are asking what KeepAliveTimeout setting should be used for Apache config. We usually select 2 to 5 seconds as it provides best performance for sites with medium visitors and prefer to use Nginx or any other front-end proxy to better manage thousands of multiple concurrent users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxblog.org/apache-keepalivetimeout-tunning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ReiserFS for scalable and high load SMTP servers</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxblog.org/reiserfs-for-scalable-and-high-load-smtp-servers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxblog.org/reiserfs-for-scalable-and-high-load-smtp-servers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 02:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxblog.org/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have seen great performance on using ReiserFS for mail system spools and in our tests ReiserFS file system spool for Postfix queues was very fast. For best performance we used
notail, noatime mount options in /etc/fstab file.
Full example:
/dev/sda2/usr reiserfs notail,noatime,rw,auto 0 0
notatime &#8211; turns off atimes calls, reduces IO and greatly increases file system performance
notail [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have seen great performance on using ReiserFS for mail system spools and in our tests ReiserFS file system spool for Postfix queues was very fast. For best performance we used</p>
<p><em>notail</em>, <em>noatime</em> mount options in <em>/etc/fstab</em> file.</p>
<p>Full example:</p>
<p><em>/dev/sda2/usr reiserfs notail,noatime,rw,auto 0 0</em></p>
<p><strong>notatime</strong> &#8211; turns off atimes calls, reduces IO and greatly increases file system performance<br />
<strong>notail</strong> &#8211; increases performance of ReiserFS especially for small files &#8211; works great for mail servers, web servers and caches. This option disables file pckaging in tree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxblog.org/reiserfs-for-scalable-and-high-load-smtp-servers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
